<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://rvva.wetpaint.com/xsl/rss2html.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://rvva.wetpaint.com/scripts/wpcss/wiki/rvva/skin/organic/rss" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Ramona Valley Vineyard Association - Recently Updated Pages</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/pageSearch/updated</link><description>Recently Updated Pages on http://rvva.wetpaint.com</description><language>en-us</language><webMaster>info@wetpaint.com</webMaster><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:16:51 CDT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:16:51 CDT</lastBuildDate><generator>wetpaint.com</generator><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Harvest Planning</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Harvest+Planning</link><author>RVVACarolyn</author><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Harvest+Planning</guid><comments>Moved from: Welcome to the RVVA Library</comments><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:16:51 CDT</pubDate><description>DECIDING WHEN TO PICK&lt;br&gt;By &lt;br&gt;Lum Eisenman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under-ripe red grapes are low in sugar, low in flavor, low in color and high in acid. Wines made from under-ripe grapes can be overly tart, and they often have herbaceous, green bean or bell pepper flavors. Wines made from under-ripe grapes also have poor color, low flavor intensity and often lack varietal character.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overripe, red grapes are high in sugar, low in acid and high in color. Wine made from overripe grapes are high in alcohol, and they can taste &amp;ldquo;flat&amp;rdquo; or bland because they are too low in acidity. Furthermore, wines produced from overripe grapes often have &amp;ldquo;cooked fruit&amp;rdquo; or prune flavors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Properly ripened red grapes have the correct amount of sugar, acid, color, and good varietal character and flavor intensity. Wines made from properly ripened grapes will have the correct amount of alcohol, good color and flavor intensity, and good varietal character with some &amp;ldquo;red fruit&amp;rdquo; flavors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HARVEST DECISIONS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To make high quality wine, the grapes must be picked at the optimum time, but determining when to pick the grapes is not always an easy task. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;Brix&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sugar content has been used as the primary indicator of grape ripeness for hundreds of years, and many growers still rely on sugar readings to decide when to pick their grapes. Consequently, obtaining accurate sugar measurements is important. In this country, grape sugar content is measured using the Brix scale. Brix is &amp;ldquo;grams of dissolved solids in 100 grams of juice.&amp;rdquo; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brix can be measured with either a hydrometer or an optical instrument called a refractometer. The accuracy of either instrument depends upon temperature. Most hydrometers are calibrated at a temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit, and a correction must be applied to the readings when measurements are made at any other temperature. However, most modern refractometers are temperature compensated, and the compensation greatly reduces the temperature error. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ordinary tap water can be used to check the zero point of hydrometers and refractometers. Hydrometers do not have zero adjustments. Any zero offset must be added or subtracted as each measurement is made. Most refractometers have an adjustment screw to set the zero point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides calibrating the zero point, many winegrowers also use a Brix calibration solution. They make up a standard, 20-Brix solution by dissolving 100 grams of ordinary table sugar (sucrose) in 400 grams of distilled water, [100 grams / (400 + 100) grams = 20 grams / 100 grams]. This 20-Brix solution can be used to calibrate both hydrometers and refractometers, but the sugar and water must be ACCURATELY measured.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;Titratable Acid (TA)&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tartaric and malic acids make up roughly 90 percent of the acid content in grapes. The amounts of tartaric acid and malic acid are about equal when grapes start to change color (veraison). The quantity of tartaric acid remains roughly constant throughout the ripening period. But, malic acid decreases as the grapes ripen, and the loss of malic acid results in a gradual decrease in the titratable acid (TA) of the juice during the ripening period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;pH&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grape acids differ in strength, and tartaric acid is stronger than malic acid. A quantity called pH is used to measure the strength of the acids, and pH uses an inverse, logarithmic scale. High acid grapes have a low pH, and low acid grapes have a high pH because of the upside down scale. As grapes ripen, malic acid is lost. The acid content decreases, so the pH of the juice increases. Late in the ripening process potassium ions accumulate more rapidly in the juice. The potassium ions interact with acids in the grapes and cause the pH of the juice to increase more rapidly just as the grapes are reaching maturity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OTHER HARVEST CRITERIA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cabernet Sauvignon grapes picked at 24 Brix in one vineyard may produce high quality wine. But, Cabernet grapes grown a mile away may produce green, under ripe tasting wines when picked at 24 Brix. A third, nearby Cabernet vineyard might produce overripe, stewed-fruit tasting wines when picked at 24 Brix. Sugar content alone may not provide an adequate measure of grape maturity, so here are a few more ways a winegrower can use to judge grape ripeness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;A Clean Pedicel&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;When grapes are fully ripe, the pedicel (stem) can be pulled off the berry easily and little or no pulp or skin tissue will be attached to the pedicel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;Soft Berries&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Berries dehydrate slightly, and the texture of the pulp softens when grapes ripen. When red grapes are fully ripe, the berries are not quite so firm when squeezed and the skin becomes slightly slack (not wrinkled like a raisin).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;Red Fruit Flavors&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under-ripe red grapes often have a green, herbaceous smell and taste reminiscent of asparagus or bell peppers. Ripe grapes have less of this green, herbaceous character and more plum and cherry characteristics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brown Seeds&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;The color of grape seeds changes from green to brown as the berries ripen, but all of the seeds don&amp;rsquo;t get ripe at the same time. In most varieties, the pointed ends of the seeds (the &amp;ldquo;beaks&amp;rdquo;) are the last part to turn brown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IN THE VINEYARD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As harvest day approaches, the winegrower goes to the vineyard every few days to inspect the vines and to check fruit maturity. He looks at the condition of the vines to see if they are strong enough to continue ripening the grapes. Then the grower walks up and down the rows. He picks grapes one by one and carefully examines each berry. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) He pulls the pedicel from the berry and looks to see how much pulp is attached. &lt;br&gt;(2) He checks the texture of the berries by gently squeezing them between his thumb and forefinger to see if the grapes have started to soften.&lt;br&gt;(3) The grower tastes and smells the grapes to see if the herbaceous character has diminished and the red fruit character has started to develop.&lt;br&gt;(4) The grower spits the seeds into his hand and looks to see if the seeds have changed color. Some winegrowers will NOT pick red grapes until 70 to 80 percent of the seeds are brown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sugar Sample Collection&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ripeness varies from grape to grape, from cluster to cluster and from vine to vine. Berries near the shoulder of a cluster will be more mature than berries near the bottom. Clusters exposed to sunlight develop faster than clusters hanging in heavy shade, so clusters from the north side of vines are generally less mature than clusters from the south side. Maturity also varies from vine to vine across a vineyard because of changes in soil conditions, water content and wind exposure. To minimize these variations, the grower collects a large sample of grapes to take to the laboratory where he measures Brix, TA and pH using standard measurement techniques. Here is a simple but effective way to collect a grape sample.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1). A 1 quart size, heavy weight, zip-seal &amp;ldquo;baggy&amp;rdquo; is used to collect the grapes. The date and the vineyard block being sampled can be written on the baggy with a &amp;ldquo;magic marker.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;(2). Grapes can be collected from each vine, every other vine, every fifth vine, etc. But, be consistent and collect at least 100 grapes.&lt;br&gt;(3). Most of the sample grapes should be picked from the bottom of the clusters (watch out for bees), and be sure to pick some berries from clusters growing back under the foliage in heavy shade. (This procedure produces results that are more conservative).&lt;br&gt;(4). Seal the baggy and keep the grapes cool until the Brix, titratable acid and pH measurements can be made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SUMMARY&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some winegrowers pick each year &amp;ldquo;when the grapes reach 24 Brix.&amp;rdquo; Other growers pick &amp;rdquo;when the TA crosses the pH plot.&amp;rdquo; But, deciding when to pick is not easy, so contentious winegrowers use all the information available. They use Brix, TA and pH data together with their vineyard observations to decide when to pick. So, this walking about the vineyard picking, squeezing, tasting, spitting seeds and collecting sample grapes is an annual pre harvest ritual.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DECIDING WHEN TO PICK THE GRAPES IS THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION A WINEMAKER MAKES EACH SEASON.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;hr size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description></item><item><title>Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Lum+Eisenman+Ramona+Valley+Wine+Competition</link><author>RVVACarolyn</author><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Lum+Eisenman+Ramona+Valley+Wine+Competition</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:05:45 CDT</pubDate><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Competition Report - 14 July 2008 &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;by Bob Weirich&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Ramona Valley grapes were the stars of the night at last evening&amp;#39;s Ramona Valley  Vineyard Association second annual Lum Eisenman Wine Competition which was held  at Rosa and Gerry Cordiano&amp;#39;s winery. It takes good grapes to make good wine and  the verdict from the well respected panel of judges was that of the 52 wines  entered, all of which are required to contain a minimum of 85% Ramona Valley  grapes, was that most of the wines were very good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The judges, Lum  Eisenman, Mike Menghini, Jim Jenkins, John Alonge, Gus Visgirda, and Pete  Anderson, praised the efforts of all the vintners, both professional and  amateur, who entered and singled out several, including Cactus Star Vineyards,  Pamo Valley vineyards, Woof&amp;#39;n Rose Winery, Adobe Vineyard, and Hellenback Ranch for  their excellent entries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In all a total of 29 medals were awarded (9 silver and 20 bronze). Don Kohorst  of Pyramid Vineyards, the chairman of the competition committee, termed the  event a success and encouraged all winemakers using Ramona Valley grapes to  enter their wines next year and have their wines evaluated. &amp;quot; the feedback one receives from the  judges can only make for better wines coming out of the Ramona Valley AVA.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;___________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Update - 7 July 2008&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CHANGE OF LOCATION FOR AWARDS BANQUET&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;The 13 July Awards Banquet for the 2008 Lum  Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition has been moved - the Sizzler  Restaurant&amp;#39;s new management was unable to get their ABC license issued in time  to support our event on 13 July, so rather than drinking nothing but iced tea  all evening, we&amp;#39;ve re-located the event.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;RVVA members Gerry and Rosa Cordiano have  graciously agreed to host us on the patio of their  wine-tasting-room-in-waiting. For those of you who haven&amp;#39;t yet visited, you&amp;#39;ll  find thatthis is a great place, and the dinner will be delicious. Cordiano  Winery is located just outside of the boundary of the Ramona Valley AVA, off of  Highland Valley Road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Date: Sunday, 13 July 2008&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Time: 6PM&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Place: Cordiano Winery&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.cordianowinery.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;www.cordianowinery.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;15732 Highland Valley Rd.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Escondido CA 92025&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; phone 866-92-AMORE&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Each winemaker will receive the scoresheet that the  judges used to evaluate their wine(s). The judges will be available to review  the score sheets with the winemakers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Medals willbe presented to the wines that the  judges determined to be good (bronze), excellent (silver), or outstanding (gold)  examples of the potentialof the Ramona Valley.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Don has recorked and deeply chilled the remains of  the 52 bottles of wine that were entered and judged, and they will be available  before dinner for limited tasting. Anyattendee is also welcome to bring their  own Ramona Valley wine to share for dinner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Please respond to this message with the number of  attendeesso I will know you got it; otherwise we will be calling you later this  week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;If you haven&amp;#39;t already made your reservation and sent your $20 per person  for the awards banquet, please let me know ASAP and I will see if we can make  room for more. (Each judge and a guest will be our guests for the evening.)  Right now we have a total of 50 people expected. We&amp;#39;re looking forward to  it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;the RVVA Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition Committee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Don Kohorst&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Carolyn Harris &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Joe Cullen&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Bob Weirich&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Paul Griffin&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;______________________________________&lt;br&gt;Carolyn Harris&lt;br&gt;Lum Eisenman  Ramona Valley Wine Competition&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.rvva.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.rvva.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:carolyn@chuparosavineyards.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;carolyn@chuparosavineyards.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;_____________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update - 10 June 2008&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Judging is complete. Results      are being tallied.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Winners will be announced at      the Awards Banquet - Sunday 13 July 2008 at the Ramona Sizzler (6PM). Half      of the seats are already taken. If you don&amp;#39;t already have a reservation,      send a check for $20 per person to:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Ramona Valley Vineyard       Association&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;c/o Carolyn Harris&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;910 Gem Lane&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Ramona CA 92065&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;_______________________________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;2008 ANNUAL LUM EISENMAN RAMONA VALLEY WINE COMPETITION&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CALL FOR ENTRIES - Due 24 May 2008&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;The Second Annual Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition will be held this  Spring, and the Entry Form and Rules details are attached below&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;The purpose of the competition is to (1) honor Lum  Eisenman for his significant and continuing contributions to grape growing and  wine making in San Diego County,(2) focus on the potential of the Ramona Valley  AVA for the production of quality wines, and (3) provide constructive  confidential feedback to Ramona Valley&amp;#39;s grape growers and  winemakers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had a great time last year. Please read the report below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;If you are making wine from Ramona Valley grapes,  or know of someone who is (private or licensed), please enter your wine,and  forward this announcement to those who would be interested.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Follow these links for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Announcement+and+Rules&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;Announcement and Rules&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Entry+Form&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;Entry Form.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;PDF versions of the documents can also be found as attachments on the links at the bottom of this page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Please let us know if you have any questions. Our  email addresses are included in the Announcement and Rules document.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition  Committee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Don Kohorst - Director&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Bob Weirich - Cellarmaster&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Joe Cullen - Judging Coordinator&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Paul Griffin - Awards Manager&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; Carolyn Harris - Business Manager&lt;br&gt;_____________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;2007 Report&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;RAMONA VALLEY HONORS LUM EISENMAN&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Sunday, 24 June 2007 was declared by proclamation of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors to be Lum Eisenman Day throughout the County. The proclamation was awarded during a Ramona Valley Vineyard Association recognition banquet marking the first annual Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Mr. Eisenman has been involved in small wineries and home winemaking for all of his adult life and has devoted himself to teaching upcoming grape growers and winemakers in the area. The Ramona Valley area of San Diego County has particularly benefited from his generous assistance and thanked him Sunday night by presenting the first Ramona Valley Wine Competition awards in his name, and unveiling the County proclamation sponsored by Supervisor Dianne Jacob.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The award was the highlight of the evening and marked a long anticipated recognition of the re-establishment of premium grape growing and wine making in San Diego County.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Mr. Eisenman has been a lifelong resident of southern California, spending the last 57 years in San Diego County. He worked as a teenager in the Zinfandel vineyards and wineries of the Cucamonga Valley, and then spent a career as a physicist, while making garage-based home winemaking an art form. Upon his retirement, he wrote and published &lt;i&gt;The Home Winemakers&amp;#39; Manual,&lt;/i&gt; which he generously published on the internet for all to share (&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.geocities.com/lumeisenman/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.geocities.com/lumeisenman/&lt;/a&gt;). He is a founding member of the San Diego County Amateur Winemaking Society (&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.sdaws.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.sdaws.org&lt;/a&gt;) and the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association (&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonavalleyvineyards.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonavalleyvineyards.org&lt;/a&gt;). He now assists grape growers and winemakers throughout San Diego County, and is the Winemaker for Belle Marie Winery in North Escondido.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Also of historical note at the banquet was the table displaying 41 wine bottles - every one proudly listing &amp;quot;Ramona Valley&amp;quot; as the source for the grapes. The Ramona Valley was designated as an American Viticulture Area (AVA) in January 2006. The wines were made by 19 winemakers residing throughout San Diego County; 8 from commercially licensed wineries and 11 private winemakers. There were 28 red wines, 4 red blends, 4 white wines, 2 dessert and 1 rose&amp;#39; wine entered. 78% of the entries were very young - split between 2005 and 2006 vintages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The judges were Lum Eisenman, Mike Menghini and Jim Jenkins. Due to the youth of the vineyards and wines, no first place ribbons were awarded this year. However,the judges did recommend three second place red ribbons and 19 white ribbons, all representing good examples of the Ramona Valley AVA&amp;#39;s potential. Mike Menghini said that a significant majority of the wines he tasted were definitely of a commercial caliber and is looking forward to tasting the wines as the vineyards and experience levels of the winemakers develop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Lum Eisenman said he is really looking forward to tasting Ramona Valley wines over the next five years, because the promise that was shown by the grape growers and winemakers this year will continue to improve and show its potential.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;        &lt;b&gt;___________________________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;hr size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ramona Valley Grapes for Sale</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Ramona+Valley+Grapes+for+Sale</link><author>RVVACarolyn</author><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Ramona+Valley+Grapes+for+Sale</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:50:19 CDT</pubDate><description> 			&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Sangiovese, Sangiovese-Brunello, Aglianico, Merlot, Cabernet Sauvignon, and Viognier&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Schweitzer&lt;br&gt; Paccielo Vineyard&lt;br&gt; 16988 Sky Valley Drive&lt;br&gt; Ramona 760-788-2446&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:bill@paccielo.com?subject=grapes+for+sale&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;bill@paccielo.com&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;_________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description></item><item><title>Welcome to the RVVA Library</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Welcome+to+the+RVVA+Library</link><author>RVVACarolyn</author><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Welcome+to+the+RVVA+Library</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:30:12 CDT</pubDate><description> 			&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/Lum+Eisenman+Ramona+Valley+Wine+Competition&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;2008 Lum Eisenman Ramona Valley Wine Competition&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;_________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Welcome to the on-line library of the &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonavalleyvineyards.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ramona Valley Vineyard Association&lt;/a&gt;, an unincorporated association of vineyard owners and supporters in the Ramona Valley American Viticulture Area (AVA) in San Diego County, California, USA (&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonavalleyvineyards.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonavalleyvineyards.org&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are all dedicated to the production of quality wine grapes and the establishment of a quality wine region. We believe that the Ramona Valley has a unique opportunity to start out on the right foot with this project by taking advantage of recent developments in viticulture and enology world-wide. Our goal is to avoid &amp;quot;reinventing the wheel&amp;quot;, or repeating previous errors, while at the same time realizing that our region is unique, and past research and experiences in the viticulture world may not apply to us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All RVVA members are invited and encouraged to post information on this site that they think other members would like to access. While the &amp;quot;whole world&amp;quot; can see this site (as with any other web site) only RVVA members can add or change content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We pride ourselves in being generous with the information we&amp;#39;ve individually accumulated and learned so that the Ramona Valley can enjoy accelerated success.&lt;br&gt;_____________________________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition to the viticulture information you find on this site, make sure you read all the articles that have been posted to the &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.sdaws.org/growing.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Grape Growing&lt;/a&gt; page on the &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.sdaws.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;San Diego Amateur Winemaking Society&lt;/a&gt; web site &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.sdaws.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(www.sdaws.org)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;_____________________________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description></item><item><title>San Diego County Winery Ordinance</title><link>http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/San+Diego+County+Winery+Ordinance</link><author>RVVACarolyn</author><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rvva.wetpaint.com/page/San+Diego+County+Winery+Ordinance</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:28:58 CDT</pubDate><description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;_____________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;18 May 2008 - North County Times&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;  Supervisors adopt &amp;#39;interim&amp;#39; winery ordinance&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;County supervisors on Wednesday adopted an ordinance that gives local winemakers an easier, less expensive way to open tasting rooms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The measure was the latest development in a nearly two-year effort to ease restrictions on vintners who are eager to sell their wines on their properties.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Under current rules, winemakers can sell their wines on-site only if they get a cumbersome and expensive major use permit, which can cost $15,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The new ordinance allows winemakers who produce less than 12,000 gallons of wine a year to open tasting rooms with an administrative use permit, which has a less onerous process and a lower initial fee ---- $5,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Those who advocate for fewer restrictions on small wineries to promote the industry said the change was not such a big departure from the current policy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;I see almost no difference between an administrative use permit and a major use permit,&amp;quot; said Carolyn Harris, a member of the Ramona Valley Vineyards Association, which represents about a dozen Ramona area wine makers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Harris said both permit processes could require wine makers to conduct expensive studies, such as traffic and fire evacuation studies, that could cost business owners tens of thousands of dollars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Supervisors said the measure was a temporary compromise between those who advocate for the wine industry and those who fear the problems those businesses might cause in rural parts of the county, such as traffic and public safety concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The supervisors also asked administrators to conduct an environmental study of a permanent ordinance, which is expected to take up to two years. That ordinance would establish several categories of wineries varying in size.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The classifications would be: boutique, for those producing no more than 12,000 gallons of wine a year; small, up to 55,999 gallons; medium, no more than 100,000 gallons; and large, at least 100,000 gallons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Supervisor Dianne Jacob, who supports the winemakers&amp;#39; efforts, asked them to be patient.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;I understand the frustration, but it&amp;#39;s important to get it right,&amp;quot; Jacob said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; An ordinance passed unanimously on April 23 declared that selling wines on site and offering tasting rooms would not have a negative effect on the environment and therefore did not need an environmental study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Last month, the county received a notice from an organization called the San Diego Citizenry Group saying it intended to sue the board challenging that ordinance. The group alleged that the ordinance violated the California Environmental Quality Act.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; County Counsel John Sansone said the county would likely lose such a lawsuit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Rather than face the lawsuit, the supervisors voted to repeal the ordinance and decided to conduct the study, which is expected to cost $260,000, according to county documents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Proponents, including most supervisors, have said that easing restrictions on wineries could help revive San Diego County&amp;#39;s once-booming, pre-Prohibition wine industry, add to the county&amp;#39;s tax base and attract tourists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or &lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:esifuentes@nctimes.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;esifuentes@nctimes.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;                  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;_________________________________________________________________&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;14 May 2008 - North County Times&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;County repeals boutique winery ordinance&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Supporters vow to continue efforts to establish wine industry&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Local vintners will have to put the cork back in their plans to add tasting rooms to their wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After being threatened with a lawsuit, county supervisors on Wednesday repealed a month-old ordinance that would have allowed some small wineries to open tasting rooms without an environmental impact study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance, passed unanimously on April 23, declared that the tasting rooms would not have a negative effect on the environment and therefore did not need an environmental study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The repeal of the ordinance was inserted into the supervisors&amp;#39; agenda during Wednesday&amp;#39;s meeting after a group opposed to the tasting rooms threatened to sue the county. It was repealed without comments from the public or discussion on the dais by the supervisors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before the ordinance was approved last month, county administrators, including the county&amp;#39;s attorney, advised the supervisors that the ordinance would expose the county to a lawsuit, because they believed an environmental study was required under state law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;County Counsel John Sansone said the move to include the item on the agenda without notice did not violate open meeting laws because the matter came up after the agenda was published on Thursday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Thursday afternoon, the county received a notice from an organization called the San Diego Citizenry Group saying it intended to sue the board challenging the ordinance, according to a memo written by Sansone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The memo said the group would file the lawsuit this week unless the supervisors repealed the ordinance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sansone wrote in the memo that the group claims the ordinance violates the California Environmental Quality Act. Sansone said Wednesday the county would likely lose such a lawsuit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We thought that this action needed an environmental impact report, so our advice was that there was a real need to take action,&amp;quot; Sansone said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carolyn Harris, a member of the Ramona Valley Vineyards Association, which represents about a dozen Ramona area winemakers and spearheaded the effort to create the new ordinance, said she did not learn of the repeal until after the vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re disappointed, but it seems that the California Environmental Quality Act is being used as a weapon against the development of a winery industry in the county,&amp;quot; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marco Gonzalez, who was identified in Sansone&amp;#39;s memo as the San Diego Citizenry Group&amp;#39;s attorney, could not be reached for comment Wednesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents of the ordinance have said they were concerned about the possibility of increased drunken driving on their rural, private roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several Ramona residents who attended last month&amp;#39;s meeting spoke against the ordinance, saying the wineries would increase traffic and vandalism in the area.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Proponents, including most supervisors, have said that easing restrictions on wineries could help revive San Diego County&amp;#39;s once-booming, pre-Prohibition wine industry, add to the county&amp;#39;s tax base and attract tourists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Supervisor Dianne Jacob said Wednesday that repeal of the ordinance does not end the efforts to boost the wine industry in the county. She called it a &amp;quot;bump on the road&amp;quot; and added that the county will complete an environmental impact study to develop an ordinance that would bolster and regulate the industry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;ve lost nothing by doing this, and the goal is still to push and create a wine industry in San Diego County that would be a benefit to the region,&amp;quot; Jacob said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:esifuentes@nctimes.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;esifuentes@nctimes.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;________________________________________________________________&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;01 May 2008 - Ramona Sentinel&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;   &lt;b&gt;Boutique wineries clear major hurdle&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Joe Naiman&lt;/font&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;All four members of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors who were present for the supervisors&amp;#39; April 23 meeting voted to support a boutique winery ordinance to allow tasting rooms and on-premise wine sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads and with conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Supervisor Ron Roberts was representing the county at an airport master plan meeting when the vote was taken, but the positive votes of Greg Cox, Dianne Jacob, Pam Slater-Price, and Bill Horn gave the ordinance one more vote than necessary. The four supervisors also approved the environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration, meaning that, with mitigation measures included in the conditions, no significant environmental effects will result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This will help get things off the block, and it will help these people who have been in wine production,&amp;quot; Jacob said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new ordinance will take effect May 23. It allows wineries accessed by public roads to have tasting rooms and on-premise sales as well as Internet, phone, and mail sales. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On private roads, if fewer than 10 parcels are between the closest public road and the winery, the winery may operate by right if it enters into a road maintenance agreement, which includes addressing the liability of property owners, with all parcel owners between the public road and the winery. If a road maintenance agreement cannot be obtained, or if there are more than 10 parcels between the public road and the winery, an administrative permit will be required. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administrative permit process will require notification of all property owners within 300 feet of the winery&amp;#39;s boundaries and notification of at least 20 property owners and will not require a hearing unless either the applicant or an affected party requests such a hearing. If a hearing is requested, the county&amp;#39;s zoning administrator will hold the hearing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A zoning administrator decision can be appealed by either side to the San Diego County Planning Commission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although the supervisors rejected the recommendation of county staff for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for boutique wineries to operate by right on public roads, their vote directed county staff to develop ordinance language for larger wineries and to prepare the necessary environmental documentation for a tiered approach. That could lead to an EIR for a four-tiered system, including an EIR for the boutique wineries, although such an EIR wouldn&amp;#39;t delay the ability of the boutique wineries to open tasting rooms and have on-site sales.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That EIR may also find less than expected impacts for larger wineries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We may end up with a process that doesn&amp;#39;t require a major use permit for everybody else,&amp;quot; said San Diego County Farm Bureau Executive Director Eric Larson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In February 2007 the supervisors directed county staff to return with an ordinance that would exempt wineries producing no more than 12,000 gallons per year and on agriculturally zoned land from discretionary permits. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The zoning ordinance had defined two types of wineries. A Wholesale Limited Winery allows production of up to 7,500 gallons annually and is allowed by right in agricultural zones, but the zoning ordinance does not allow retail activities, tasting rooms, or special events. A Winery is allowed by right in industrial zones but is required to have a major use permit in agricultural zones and in certain residential and special purpose zones. Tasting rooms, special events, and retail sales can be allowed under the conditions of a major use permit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;#39; February 2007 recommendation created four new categories of wineries in addition to the Wholesale Limited Winery category. Boutique wineries produce no more than 12,000 gallons per year, small wineries produce up to 55,999 gallons annually, medium wineries produce under 100,000 gallons, and large wineries produce at least 100,000 gallons. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because the only winery in San Diego County currently producing more than 12,000 gallons annually is Orfila Vineyards, which is within San Diego city limits in the San Pasqual Valley, the ordinance approved April 23 only covered boutique wineries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The boutique winery ordinance only applies to properties with A70 and A72 agricultural zoning and is designed to avoid boutique wineries in areas with residential zoning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One tasting room measuring no more than 30 percent of the total winery structure size will be allowed. Boutique wineries cannot host special events, and tasting room hours are limited to between 10 a.m. and sunset. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least 75 percent of the wines sold must be from San Diego County grapes, and 25 percent of the wine must be from grapes grown on-site, although the county&amp;#39;s Department of Agriculture, Weights and Measures could suspend the requirement during adverse environmental circumstances or extreme economic conditions (one potential solution to the private road issue is allowing co-op tasting rooms in which wineries off private roads would send wine to facilities accessible by public roads; that is permissible under wineries&amp;#39; state licenses but may require a waiver of the 25 percent threshold). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pre-packaged food can be sold and consumed, and food service is allowed if catered or from a facility approved by the county&amp;#39;s Department of Environmental Health. No bus or caravan tours are allowed (the ordinance prohibits vehicles with a capacity of more than 12 passengers), and outdoor eating areas are limited to five tables and no more than 10 people. No amplified sound is allowed, and chip seal or alternative material is required for driveway access and parking areas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We had no idea this was going to be this difficult,&amp;quot; Larson said. &amp;quot;Little did the winery folks know that they&amp;#39;d be pushing boulders uphill.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In September 2007 the planning commission unanimously recommended that wineries accessible by public roads be allowed by right while noting that time would be required for a solution to wineries accessed by private roads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents have indicated that all owners of a private road may be liable if an accident occurs and that trips to wineries may create a disproportional burden on private roads for which all owners share maintenance cost responsibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;#39; 5-0 vote Dec. 5 directed county staff to return within 120 days with an ordinance that would allow tasting rooms and on-premise wine sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads while establishing conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roads. The ordinance conditions approved are similar to a Ramona Valley Winery Association compromise proposal. During a March 7 planning commission hearing, leaders from both sides of previous debates supported the compromise while some members from each side expressed opposition to the clauses intended to address each other&amp;#39;s concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The planning commission voted March 7 to recommend the compromise ordinance to the supervisors while also voting to approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the ordinance. The ordinance was slated to go to the supervisors on March 26, and the March 21 planning commission hearing initially was to have discussed minor revisions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As county Department of Planning and Land Use staff was preparing the board letter for docketing for the supervisors meeting, they believed that additional changes were warranted. They also determined that insufficient notice of the March 21 hearing was provided, so the planning commission voted unanimously to continue the hearing to April 4. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After evaluating all of the information received and conferring with county counsel, DPLU also determined that an EIR would be needed to address potential noise, traffic, and groundwater impacts from by-right on-premise sales and tasting rooms at boutique wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The planning commission voted 4-3 April 4 not to recommend an EIR for the proposed boutique winery ordinance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The arguments that were raised did not reach the level of a fair argument,&amp;quot; Planning Commissioner Adam Day told supervisors April 23. &amp;quot;There was no basis in any of the evidence that supported those claims.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During the April 23 hearing, county counsel indicated that liability was not an issue addressed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA guidelines would address only the on-site sales and tasting and not the wineries already allowed by right on agriculturally zoned areas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The EIR was not triggered,&amp;quot; said Carolyn Harris, the secretary and general counsel of the Ramona Valley Winery Association. &amp;quot;All they saw was a checklist.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris noted that CEQA states that facts, or assumptions and expert opinions backed by facts, would create the evidence to trigger an EIR but that arguments, speculations, and unsubstantiated opinions do not constitute substantial evidence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris and her husband own Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;If you&amp;#39;re going to have a tasting room, the only noise I can envision right now is a little bit of laughter, maybe a tinkling of a glass,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;This is an opportunity for the Board of Supervisors to support agriculture.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;You&amp;#39;re always going to have naysayers,&amp;quot; said Ramona Chamber of Commerce President Carol Fowler. &amp;quot;A boutique winery ordinance would boost our economy and create tourism. It&amp;#39;s come just in the nick of time.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Ramona environmental constraints and the Witch Fire have augmented the current economic woes affecting other communities. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fowler noted that Ramona&amp;#39;s Ace Hardware store recently filed for bankruptcy and shut down after 40 years of operation and that she has seen more vacant stores on Main Street than at any previous time. Fowler noted that a boutique winery ordinance would make Ramona a tourist destination rather than a town on the way to other tourist attractions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richard McClellan of Ramona has a vineyard with eight varietals on three acres but does not operate a winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re talking about agricultural use,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McClellan noted that the requirement that 25 percent of grapes be grown on-site will limit supply and thus the impacts of visits. McClellan is also a partner with a nephew who has a winery in eastern Washington, and he said that county has 110 wineries totaling approximately 1,500 acres. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The entire economic growth in that county has been due to the wine industry,&amp;quot; he said, adding that the demand for wine also increased the price of wine grapes from $500 per ton to between $2,000 and $3,000 per ton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona Valley Winery Association member Michael Kopp of Kohill Winery said that his winery&amp;#39;s 1,450 vines equate to four tons or 250 cases per year and that Chuparosa Vineyards&amp;#39; 1,750 vines equated to five tons or 300 cases per year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re not those huge wineries in Napa,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We bought ag land and we&amp;#39;re allowed to use it for agricultural uses,&amp;quot; said Beth Edwards of Edwards Cellars in Ramona. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m already a winery. I&amp;#39;m already growing grapes.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harvesting and wholesale sales (with state approval) are already permitted uses in agricultural areas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m really not a business that&amp;#39;s going to generate a lot of impact,&amp;quot; Edwards said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schwaesdall Winery is Ramona&amp;#39;s only boutique winery with a major use permit for a tasting room. John Schwaesdall completed that process in 1996 at a cost of $7,000. The average major use permit now costs $218,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;d have to take out a loan, and I don&amp;#39;t even qualify for that loan,&amp;quot; Edwards said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards noted that grapes are a low-water crop. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re talking about keeping ag in San Diego County,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;We need some relief to be able to do it.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gerardo Cordiano&amp;#39;s winery in Highland Valley between Ramona and Escondido has six acres of cabernet franc, merlot, and tempranillo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;There will be a negligible amount of traffic that will be mitigated by TIF (transportation impact fee) fees,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Noise will not be created because of the limitations.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While several nearby homes were destroyed in the Witch Fire, the vineyard helped spare Cordiano&amp;#39;s house. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;When they say there is a fire hazard, they don&amp;#39;t know what they are talking about,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cordiano noted that his land is already farmed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;There is not one iota of difference,&amp;quot; he said of the impacts of on-site sales and tasting rooms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larry Escalona recently planted one acre of cabernet franc, petit verdot, and sangiovese on his Ramona property. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Without this ordinance we do not have an opportunity,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;This ordinance will help make that dream possible for all of us.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Escalona also cited a trend away from purchases of large corporate products. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;More people are buying organic from small farms,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The real issue here is trying to balance the residents&amp;#39; concerns,&amp;quot; said Jerry Jolly, a former director of the state Alcoholic Beverage Commission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ABC issues a Type 02 winegrowers license which allows for wholesale sales. Jolly noted that the ABC process for retail sales or on-site tasting rooms was similar to the county&amp;#39;s administrative use permit process. The ABC can incorporate conditions, including those which are part of the county ordinance, and the ABC can revoke licenses for violations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It gives you a lot more enforcement authority,&amp;quot; Jolly said. &amp;quot;Those will be investigated and they can work with the county in this process.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ABC conditions can include road maintenance agreements, including liability resolutions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;There really is no evidence that boutique wineries have been a problem,&amp;quot; Jolly said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We can enable a wine industry in this county or not,&amp;quot; said Dennis Grimes of Ramona, whose Eagle&amp;#39;s Nest Winery in Ramona harvests five acres of primarily sirah, zinfindel, and merlot. &amp;quot;I think it&amp;#39;s going to be wonderful for this county. There&amp;#39;s huge potential, really positive potential here.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grimes opposed the 10-parcel threshold, calling it a violation of Constitutional equal protection language. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Of the three options before us today, none of them are acceptable or perfect in their own right,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DPLU interim deputy director Jeff Murphy noted that the ten-parcel threshold was based on past traffic impact thresholds. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The threshold of ten lots was not an arbitrary number,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 10-parcel threshold includes parcels on all roadway access between the public road and the winery. If multiple roads are involved, all parcels on those roads would be counted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Private roads are a liability burden,&amp;quot; said Jim Beggs of Ramona. &amp;quot;The traffic noise and other noise impacts will be potentially significant. &amp;quot;The burden of proof is on the vintners.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beggs noted that most roads serving A70 and A72 properties are private roads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The administrative permitting process is not appropriate for protecting the public welfare,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;It is clearly in the public interest to keep a major use permit.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve Pelzer of Ramona told the supervisors that complaints from both sides indicated a problem. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It seems as though you already have an ordinance on the books that really does cover everything,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;If the county had an agricultural element in its general plan, we might be more clear,&amp;quot; said Carol Angus of Ramona. &amp;quot;The liability issue was the number one issue which was to be addressed. I&amp;#39;m not here to be a naysayer. I&amp;#39;m here to protect myself and my property from having lawsuits.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Angus told the supervisors that liability insurance for other users of a private road couldn&amp;#39;t be covered under her umbrella policy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t believe I have to contribute to the economics by accepting liability on my own,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave Rueda of Ramona noted that most residents of homes off of private roads bought in that location to control ingress and egress. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This boutique winery ordinance amendment would negate that,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;There is definitely a problem with this amendment which needs to be addressed.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce Eastwood and his wife have lived in Ramona for 22 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I am against boutique wineries on private roads,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Only winery people get benefit of the road and their neighbors get increased liability risk. If there is to be wineries in San Diego County, have them on public roads, not on private roads.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eastwood echoed proponents&amp;#39; comments that two years have been spent on the process. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Why throw good money after bad?&amp;quot; Eastwood said. &amp;quot;Discontinue this thing.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona resident Don Kovacic cited a 1993 San Diego County court case in which residents of several private roads in Ramona were named as co-defendants following a two-car traffic accident resulting in broken bones. The local resident did not sue, but the Escondido driver filed a suit which was settled out of court. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Any private road off another private road, any homeowner on that private road can be held liable,&amp;quot; Kovacic said. &amp;quot;I believe a major use permit should be required for boutique wineries.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Schweitzer, president of the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association, told the supervisors that there were no known cases in other counties of such lawsuits resulting from boutique wineries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We have anecdotal and actuarial information about liability,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schweitzer noted that the wineries could list the other private road property owners as additional named insureds. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The companies would not allow that if it was going to cost them anything,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Let&amp;#39;s help these farmers and these small wine growers have a living on their land.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slater-Price noted that the solution of a road maintenance agreement would alleviate impacts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t see how anyone would be surprised if they had to sign a road maintenance agreement,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;These are grape-growing areas. This is agriculturally-zoned land,&amp;quot; Slater-Price said. &amp;quot;What you&amp;#39;re seeing here are very small parcels that have been farmed.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slater-Price also noted that growing grapes has a positive environmental effect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;They could be growing other crops that&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;use a lot more water,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;Agricultural operations do generate some noise. They generate some dust. These are choices people make when they buy property in an agricultural zone.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slater-Price acknowledged the validity of the traffic issue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It seems to me that there are ways to manage that,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slater-Price added that the ABC requires new drawings, if not a new application, when facilities with sales are altered.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Slater-Price noted that the goal of a governing body is to create the greatest benefit with the least amount of harm. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The purpose of government is really not just to erect constant barriers,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;ldquo;I&amp;#39;m not sure that we need to go down this more tortuous path assuming the traffic issues can be maintained.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris indicated that existing Julian wineries with tasting rooms peak at an average daily traffic volume of five vehicles. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Murphy noted that an average single-family home will generate ten to twelve average daily trips.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Horn has lived on land in Valley Center with A70 zoning since 1970 and notes that each time a new neighbor buys nearby property complaints are made about existing agricultural operations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think agriculture has a by-right,&amp;quot; he said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I just cannot see one trigger,&amp;quot; Horn said of an EIR requirement. &amp;quot;I just do not believe this industry should have to wait another two years or another year to make this work.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the December hearing, Horn had noted that the restriction to agriculturally-zoned land did not allow for such wineries on parcels with S92, or general rural, zoning. A separate Board of Supervisors vote Dec. 5 directed county staff to explore the feasibility of establishing viticultural zones in San Diego County, although that issue was also postponed to focus on the boutique winery operations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re not looking at establishing a vineyard, growing grapes, establishing a winery operation, because that is already allowed by right,&amp;quot; Jacob said. &amp;quot;There is absolutely no effect on any biological resources. The vineyard is already there. The grapes are already growing.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A building can already be erected with a ministerial permit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re doing wine tasting. God forbid if there are any pesticides involved,&amp;quot; Jacob said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jacob noted that the only water impacts would be from washing glasses and flushing toilets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;All that we&amp;#39;re doing is selling the wine,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re talking an insignificant impact on water supply.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The four-tiered system covers wineries which expand beyond 12,000 gallons per year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It enables a stepped approach to growing into a small or medium-sized winery,&amp;quot; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I still would like to see us get to the ultimate goal, the tiered approach,&amp;quot; Jacob said. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;d like to continue this process.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That led to Jacob&amp;#39;s motion for the development of the full four-tiered system, including the environmental documentation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson is not afraid of an Environmental Impact Report for larger wineries if that is needed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Let&amp;#39;s get it done, let&amp;#39;s get it done right, and let&amp;#39;s not continue to hold this industry hostage,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson noted that the Board of Supervisors reiterated its past support for agriculture in agriculturally-zoned areas. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;That was quite important,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;/font&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;Copyright Ramona Sentinel&lt;/font&gt;   &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonasentinel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;www.ramonasentinel.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;_______________________________________________________________&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;23 April 2008 - North County Times&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Supervisors OK boutique winery ordinance&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer &lt;/font&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;SAN DIEGO ---- County supervisors on Wednesday made it easier for small wineries to open tasting rooms, but that doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily mean that customers will be sipping local wine any time soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors waived a requirement for cumbersome and expensive major-use permits. Instead, they left it up to the neighbors, who must unanimously agree to the wine-tasting rooms, a condition one vintner said could prove nearly as restrictive as the permits. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Supervisors voted 4-0, with Supervisor Ron Roberts absent, to allow boutique wineries to open tasting rooms on private roads with fewer than 10 residences by creating road maintenance agreements with neighbors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Applicants on private roads with more than 10 residences would need a major-use permit from the county. Major-use permits require costly land-use and environmental reviews.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carolyn Harris, a member of the Ramona Valley Vineyards Association, which represents about a dozen Ramona area winemakers and spearheaded the effort to create the new ordinance, praised the supervisors&amp;#39; decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris is co-owner of the Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, Harris said her group hopes to change the ordinance because it would be too difficult for most wineries to get unanimous agreements from neighbors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance is designed to foster local winemakers and boost the region&amp;#39;s once-thriving industry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also includes a provision that will allow wineries to sell their products on the property, by mail, by phone and via the Internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under previous regulations, winemakers could sell wholesale to restaurants and markets, but not directly to the public. Opening a tasting room will make it easier for them to market and sell the wines, supporters said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance, which takes effect in 30 days, was opposed by neighbors in Ramona who said they were concerned about the possibility of increased drunken driving on their rural, private roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To ease neighbors&amp;#39; concerns, the ordinance includes a requirement for the wineries to enter into a road maintenance agreement with their neighbors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some neighbors said Wednesday they remain worried about insurance liability and lawsuits stemming from accidents on the roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The cumulative effect of wine tasting can&amp;#39;t be ignored,&amp;quot; said Jim Beggs, a Ramona resident opposed to the ordinance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Supervisor Dianne Jacob recommended that county planners work to establish a tiered category of wineries, with each category requiring more regulation. The classifications would be: boutique, for those producing no more than 12,000 gallons of wine a year; small, up to 55,999 gallons; medium, no more than 100,000 gallons; and large, at least 100,000 gallons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During public comment, about six Ramona residents spoke against the ordinance, including Bruce Eastwood, who said a winery near his property had caused an increase in traffic and vandalism in the area. The ordinance also has created animosity among residents, he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This has pitted neighbor against neighbor,&amp;quot; Eastwood said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Proponents, including most supervisors, have said that easing the restrictions could help revive San Diego County&amp;#39;s once-booming, pre-Prohibition wine industry, add to the county&amp;#39;s tax-base and attract tourists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before Prohibition, when the federal government banned the sale of alcohol in the 1920s, the Ramona area was home to hundreds of acres of vineyards, according to the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association&amp;#39;s Web site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today, it has 20 vineyards covering 60 acres, according to the group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s a big first step in the right direction,&amp;quot; Supervisor Jacob said of the ordinance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:esifuentes@nctimes.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#0000ff&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;esifuentes@nctimes.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;_____________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;21 April 2008 - North County Times&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Decision may be uncorked for &amp;#39;boutique&amp;#39; wineries&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;County supervisors are scheduled to decide Wednesday whether small wineries that want to offer tasting rooms will be required to pay for expensive building permits and environmental studies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Winemakers in the Ramona area say that a requirement to pay for the permits and studies to open tasting rooms would dash their hopes of reviving the once-booming industry. &lt;br&gt;County officials have been struggling to find a compromise between vintners and their neighbors to create an ordinance that will allow &amp;quot;boutique&amp;quot; wineries to open tasting rooms without having to pay more than the $40,000 that some of the permits and studies cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In their recommendation to supervisors, county planners said the ordinance should require winery operators who want tasting rooms to conduct environmental impact reports addressing traffic, noise and related issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite those recommendations, the county Planning Commission, in a split vote April 4, sided with winemakers and ruled the studies weren&amp;#39;t necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will be up to the supervisors to make the final decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carolyn Harris, a member of the Ramona Valley Vineyards Association, said few winemakers could afford to produce such a study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The association, which has led the fight to create the ordinance, represents about a dozen Ramona-area wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t think you&amp;#39;re going to see too many applications for major-use permits&amp;quot; to build tasting rooms, Harris said Friday. &amp;quot;I can guarantee you that.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ordinance proponents have said that making it easier for boutique wineries to open tasting rooms could help resurrect the industry, attract tourists and increase the county&amp;#39;s tax base.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents, including some backcountry residents, say they are worried that the wineries, some of which are on private roads, would create public safety hazards, such as drunken drivers, on poorly maintained roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In December, the supervisors asked county planners to address the question of allowing boutique wineries on private roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Owners proposed a plan that would allow small wineries with tasting rooms on private roads with fewer than 10 residences to create road maintenance agreements with neighbors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Applicants on private roads with more than 10 residences would need a permit from the county.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris said the county&amp;#39;s Department of Planning and Land Use and the county counsel threw wineries a curve ball late in the game, saying last month that if the ordinance is approved without requiring winery owners to conduct environmental studies, it could expose the county to a lawsuit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris said the county should have made that determination two years ago, when the discussion about the ordinance began.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We just wasted two years of our lives, thank you very much,&amp;quot; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ordinance opponents say that requiring wineries to apply for a major-use permit, which includes the environmental study, is only fair to their neighbors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I know that some people think that the whole concept of having small wineries is neat, but you don&amp;#39;t give up your zoning&amp;quot; requirements, said Jack Phillips, chairman of the Valle del Oro Community Planning Group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors are scheduled to meet at 9 a.m. Wednesday at the county administration building in San Diego.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or &lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:esifuentes@nctimes.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;esifuentes@nctimes.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/04/21/news/sandiego/92ea0caaca8c4ed08825742f0061a137.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/04/21/news/sandiego/92ea0caaca8c4ed08825742f0061a137.txt&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;_____________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;17 April 2008 - Ramona Sentinel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boutique wineries squeak through county planners&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Joe Naiman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;A proposed boutique winery ordinance does not need an environmental impact report (EIR), county planning commissioners agreed in a 4-3 vote. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;San Diego County Board of Supervisors, scheduled to hear the ordinance proposal April 23, will have the final decision whether to approve the ordinance allowing tasting rooms and on-premise wine sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads, with conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roadsor require an EIR to study the impacts of by-right tasting rooms and on-premise sales for wineries off public and private roads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The decision not to require an EIR could be challenged in court, which is why the county&amp;#39;s Department of Planning and Land Use (DPLU) and county counsel recommended an EIR.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Planning commissioners Bryan Woods, David Pallinger, Leon Brooks, and Adam Day voted to recommend not requiring an EIR. Commissioners Michael Beck, David Kreitzer, and John Riess recommended requiring an EIR for the ordinance and allowing tasting rooms and on-premise sales with an administrative permit until the EIR was certified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;If the board (of supervisors) wants to make changes to our recommendation, that&amp;#39;s certainly their right,&amp;quot; Pallinger said on April 4. &amp;quot;I think this body carefully considered this.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On March 7, San Diego County Planning Commission heard the proposed boutique winery ordinance and recommended passage of a compromise proposal while also voting to approve an environmental mitigated negative declaration for the ordinance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance was slated to go to the Board of Supervisors on March 26, and the March 21 planning commission hearing initially was to have discussed minor revisions. As DPLU staff members prepare the board letter for supervisors meeting, they believed that additional changes were needed. DPLU also determined that insufficient notice of the March 21 hearing was provided, so the planning commission voted unanimously to continue the hearing to April 4. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After evaluating all of the information received and conferring with county counsel, DPLU determined that an EIR would be needed to address potential noise, traffic, and groundwater impacts from by-right on-premise sales and tasting rooms at boutique wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The members were dismayed at the result,&amp;quot; said Bill Schweitzer, president of the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In February 2007, the board of supervisors directed county staff to return with an ordinance that would exempt wineries producing no more than 12,000 gallons per year and on agriculturally zoned land from discretionary permits. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Existing zoning rules define two types of wineries:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;  &lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;A Wholesale Limited Winery allows production of up to 7,500 gallons annually and is allowed by right in agricultural zones but does not allow retail activities, tasting rooms, or special events.&lt;/font&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;A Winery is allowed by right in industrial zones but is required to have a major use permit in agricultural zones and in certain residential and special purpose zones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;  &lt;br&gt;Tasting rooms, special events, and retail sales can be allowed under the conditions of a major use permit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;#39; February 2007 recommendation created four new categories of wineries in addition to the Wholesale Limited Winery category:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;  &lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Boutique wineries - produce no more than 12,000 gallons per year,&lt;/font&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Small wineries - produce up to 55,999 gallons annually,&lt;/font&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Medium wineries - produce under 100,000 gallons, and&lt;/font&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;  &lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Large wineries - produce at least 100,000 gallons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;  &lt;br&gt;The ordinance under consideration only covers boutique wineries. The only winery in San Diego County currently producing more than 12,000 gallons annually is Orfila Vineyards, located within the San Diego city limits in the San Pasqual Valley. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Various restrictions in the proposed ordinance cover hours of operations, local and on-site production minimum percentages, facility size, and other aspects. The proposed boutique winery ordinance only applies to properties with A70 and A72 agricultural zoning and was specifically designed to avoid boutique wineries in areas with residential zoning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Sept. 7 the county&amp;#39;s Planning Commission unanimously returned the matter to the Board of Supervisors without a specific ordinance but recommended that wineries accessible by public roads be allowed by right while noting that time would be required for a solution to wineries accessed by private roads. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents have indicated that all owners of a private road may be liable if an accident occurs and that trips to wineries may create a disproportional burden on private roads for which all owners share maintenance cost responsibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;#39; 5-0 vote Dec. 5 directed county staff to return to the supervisors within 120 days with an ordinance which would allow tasting rooms and on-premise wine sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads while establishing conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roads. The ordinance drafted by county staff provided language similar to a Ramona Valley Winery Association compromise proposal. If fewer than ten parcels between the closest public road and the winery must be accessed, the winery may operate by right if the winery enters into a road maintenance agreement, which includes addressing the liability of property owners, with all parcel owners between the public road and the winery. If a road maintenance agreement cannot be obtained, or if more than 10 parcels between the public road and the winery are accessed, an administrative permit will be required.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The alternative recommended April 4 by the Planning Commission is similar to the March 7 ordinance other than new language stipulating findings for the administrative permit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leaders from both sides of previous debates supported the March 7 compromise while some members from each side expressed opposition to the clauses intended to address each other&amp;#39;s concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whether to require an EIR or to accept a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is a discretionary matter, although a defect in the negative declaration (for example omission of an archeological site) would require an EIR. Opponents had argued that the ordinance would require an EIR, but DPLU and county counsel did not make that recommendation until after the March 7 hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We were trying to carefully weigh the evidence that had come in in support of the fair argument,&amp;quot; said Paul Mehnert, who represented county counsel at the April 4 hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mehnert indicated that DPLU and county counsel believed that the cumulative arguments were not decisive at the time of the March 7 hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It makes no sense for the county,&amp;quot; said Bud Wiederrich of Orrin Vineyards and Winery in Warner Springs. &amp;quot;It must be extremely frustrating for the board of supervisors.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harvesting and wholesale sales (with state approval) are already permitted in agricultural areas. The state Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC) issues a Type 2 winegrowers license, which allows for wholesale sales, and a letter from ABC district supervisor Robin Van Dyke said that ABC approval is necessary for retail sales or on-site tasting rooms. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ABC process also includes public hearings. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I should only have to apply to the ABC,&amp;quot; Wiederrich said. &amp;quot;There is absolutely no reason in duplicating already existing regulations.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Many of these wineries are under financial duress right now,&amp;quot; said Dennis Grimes of Eagle&amp;#39;s Nest Winery in Ramona. &amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re facing an economic downturn.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grimes noted that the EIR process covers impacts but also includes provisions for overriding considerations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s a balance implied in that intent,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t believe there are any significant issues here.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grimes added that promotion of boutique wineries would also help local lodging facilities and other retail businesses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve Pelzer, who has opposed the ordinance, submitted a neutral slip for the April 4 hearing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;What I&amp;#39;m trying to get are some answers to some questions and issues,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;...I&amp;#39;m still unclear about the administrative permit, how it works and how it addresses the issues.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administrative permit process requires notification of all property owners within 300 feet of the winery&amp;#39;s boundaries and notification of at least 20 property owners. The permit will not require a hearing unless the applicant or an affected party requests a hearing. If a hearing is requested, the county&amp;#39;s zoning administrator will hold it. A zoning administrator decision can be appealed to the planning commission by either side .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The proponents of this ordinance across the county have worked very hard the last two years,&amp;quot; said Carolyn Harris of Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona. &amp;quot;Today we are back to where we were two years ago.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris, who is also the secretary and general counsel of the Ramona Valley Winery Association, said that the only change since the hearings has been a change in staff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This has been a very abrupt turnaround,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;To say that we are appalled would be an understatement.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris noted that the intent of the proposed ordinance was to obtain relief from the major use permit requirement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It was onerous,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;It was not enabling the development of wineries in San Diego County.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two years ago advocates of the proposed ordinance inquired whether an EIR process should be started as the ordinance was being developed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;At this time it would have been accomplished,&amp;quot; Harris said. &amp;quot;I believe the EIR is being used as a very ugly weapon. I believe it&amp;#39;s not justified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;d like to see this planning commission tell the planning staff to stand down.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris opposes the interim administrative permit requirement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We are not happy with that compromise,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;It means that in the future we will continue to have zero boutique wineries.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris, who disputes the need for an EIR, asked that, if it were required, it address all four levels of wineries at the same time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think that criteria was wild-eyed, unsubstantiated and over the top,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;ll be glad to argue every single one of those wild-eyed, speculative arguments.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richard McClellan of Ramona has a vineyard on three acres but does not operate a winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Why did we get reset to zero here?&amp;quot; he asked. &amp;quot;Nothing&amp;#39;s changed. This is all the same thing.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McClellan questioned the pesticide impact of boutique wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;You don&amp;#39;t use pesticides in wineries. You do that in growing grapes,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;This is not an academic exercise. You screwed up and it&amp;#39;s costing us apparently two years.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona Valley Winery Association member Michael Kopp of Kohill Winery said, &amp;quot;Our goal here is to re-establish the wine industry in San Diego County. We compromised in good faith with the DPLU. The original structure provided a complete framework for winery industry growth.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eric Larson, the executive director of the San Diego County Farm Bureau, noted that pesticides and stormwater runoff are already regulated and that the county has strong grading and clearing ordinances to mitigate those impacts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;These issues are already addressed,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;How do you mitigate zero impact?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson also noted that the by-right authorization applies only to the boutique wineries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;These are the smallest of farmers,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;This was the entry level. This was the zero-impact farm we were talking about.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson added that the administrative permit requirement would also negate by-right mail-order or Internet sales. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;They cannot answer the phone and take an order from someone,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;That&amp;#39;s almost a restraint of trade.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson opposes the administrative permit requirement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;That process could easily be as onerous as a major use permit,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m fearful of the use permit process in farming. I&amp;#39;m fearful about the precedent it sets.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson indicated that some farmer would need to be the &amp;quot;sacrificial lamb&amp;quot; to determine the ease or lack thereof of obtaining an administrative use permit. He also argued that such permits are not necessarily in perpetuity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;That could be pulled out from underneath them sometime in the future,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We are not in support of the AUP, MUP, or EIR&amp;quot;, said Ramona Chamber of Commerce President Carol Fowler. &amp;quot;We are in support of the boutique winery ordinance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This would be the jump-start to the economy of Ramona. This is the key to making Ramona a destination, not just a pass-through community.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gerardo Cordiano owns a winery in Highland Valley between Ramona and Escondido. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We use very little water,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;The pesticides are almost nil.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beth Edwards of Edwards Cellars in Ramona told the commissioners that she may need to explain her low farm sales to the Internal Revenue Service. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We only get one crop a year,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can only put it off so long before I have to sell.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edwards noted that the administrative permit and the major use permit were both discretionary. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s really a lion named Kitty,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;The only difference is the starting fee.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The starting fee is a deposit, and more money may later be required. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I can&amp;#39;t afford that,&amp;quot; Edwards said. &amp;quot;This is farm land. I&amp;#39;m a farmer.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce Eastwood of Ramona supports the EIR requirement but does not believe the county should fund it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Developers have to pay for their EIRs,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Why shouldn&amp;#39;t these people?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I do not want intoxicated drivers or pedestrians on the private easement road on my property. Harris says we&amp;#39;re back to square one. All right, end it. Throw it out.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona resident Don Kovacic supports keeping the major use permit requirement but with streamlining and subsidies to make the process less onerous for wineries while preserving the rights of other community members. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;The CEQA issues are numerous and wide-ranging,&amp;quot; he said, citing regional cumulative impacts such as fire risk and air quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim Beggs lives on a private road in Ramona and notes that the agriculturally zoned areas contain both farms and residences. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think we have to accommodate both uses,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m for a discretionary permit process.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schwaesdall Winery, Ramona&amp;#39;s only boutique winery with a major use permit for a tasting room, is one of six wineries in San Diego County have major use permits. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t even think the major use permit process was that onerous,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Proponents have noted that John Schwaesdall completed that process in 1996 at a cost of $7,000. The average major use permit now costs $218,000 with some applicants paying below the average and others paying above the average.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schweitzer notes that the ultimate four-tier process covers wineries that grow. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Boutique wineries have limited size tasting rooms,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;If you wanted to get bigger, you&amp;#39;d have to go AUP.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The planning commission asked Mehnert whether existing regulations negated the need for an EIR. He did not think so, saying &amp;quot;You can&amp;#39;t merely defer CEQA analysis into the future.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We don&amp;#39;t think that our existing ordinances cover the full spectrum that would alleviate all these impacts,&amp;quot; said acting DPLU Director Eric Gibson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re going to place this on the heads of a small boutique winery that&amp;#39;s got three acres of grapes?&amp;quot; Woods said. &amp;quot;The information&amp;#39;s been on the table.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The county&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;farm stand&amp;quot; ordinance allows for direct sales on or adjacent to the property while limiting the farm stand to a maximum of 200 square feet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We have cottage industries that can draw some traffic to a home,&amp;quot; Kreitzer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kreitzer supported staff recommendation for an EIR, noting that such a study would prove the minimal impacts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beck believes that regional issues may exist. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beck also believes that an EIR would stave off a court-ordered EIR in the future. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I think you can add a year to this process with litigation,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;The most direct expeditious way is staff&amp;#39;s recommendation.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Riess also fears the potential of litigation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;County counsel would not be stepping forward and making this recommendation unless there was a serious risk,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m very disappointed that it came to this,&amp;quot; Pallinger said. &amp;quot;I think this really should go to the board of supervisors as previously approved by this body.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Day noted that the arguments had previously been considered. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This situation is a microcosm of the perception of failed government at every level,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;This is just a veiled threat. If they are serious, let them follow through, but let&amp;#39;s at least get to that point.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Day noted that a challenge to the mitigated negative declaration would delay the EIR by about a month. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Anyone who&amp;#39;s going to challenge this is going to have a limited time to challenge it,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;If we&amp;#39;re really serious about this, let&amp;#39;s get to the bottom line.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Copyright Ramona Sentinel&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonasentinel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonasentinel.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;3 April 2008 - Ramona Sentinel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;-0&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Economic development group works to reclaim Main Street&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;-0&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;4&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Maureen Robertson&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Reclaiming Main Street as the centerpiece of Ramona and bringing all the threads together to make that happen are high on the list of Ramona Revitalization Steering Committee&amp;rsquo;s Economic Development Subcommittee. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We really are tired of being a pass-through community,&amp;rdquo; subcommittee chair and Ramona Chamber of Commerce President Carol Fowler told a group of about 20 last Friday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The subcommittee has been working hard to identify what Ramona has, said Fowler.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have our camel farm, for example,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;We have our wineries. There&amp;rsquo;s arts, there&amp;rsquo;s antiques, there&amp;rsquo;s equine, and so we&amp;rsquo;re really concentrating on bringing all these elements together and then trying to create how are we going to get that down the hill and to the community &amp;mdash;what Ramona has to offer.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona Valley as an American Viticultural Area &amp;ldquo;is huge to us,&amp;rdquo; said Fowler. Recent talks of possibly needing an environmental impact report (EIR) before the county can approve by-right boutique wineries so vintners can open tasting rooms and offer their wines for retail sales &amp;ldquo;kind of took the tourism wind out of our sails,&amp;rdquo; said Fowler.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The vineyards and the boutique winery ordinance...are not just for the vintners,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s for the entire community and the tourism for this town. ... It really is important to the entire community, not just the vintners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The wine industry is key to Ramona.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add to that the Ramona Grasslands, and Ramona has a budding eco-tourism industry, said San Diego County Supervisor Dianne Jacob, who chaired the revitalization meeting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A total of 3,400 acres, including new acquisitions, is Ramona Grasslands, Jacob said, referring the group to a county parks and recreation map delineating grassland parcels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;This has been a priority of the community to purchase as much of this grasslands as possible for riding and hiking trails and preserving the habitat and eagles, and so forth, and the (Santa Maria Creek) greenway project is a big part of that,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trails connecting to wineries, cheese shops, landscaped parking areas in town, wine-tasting rooms, and people traveling to Ramona for a weekend of visiting boutique wineries, hiking, horseback riding, and bird watching were among topics discussed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We look for Ramona to become a destination place,&amp;rdquo; said Arvie Degenfelder, chair of the revitalization group&amp;rsquo;s Health and Human Services Subcommittee. &amp;ldquo;... What we of course desperately need is the ancillary kind of businesses (such as) motels, good restaurants.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the boutique winery ordinance that is proposed is postponed a couple more years, &amp;ldquo;there will be some marvelous winemakers here in Ramona in particular, but certainly throughout San Diego County, who are already well down the process who may go bankrupt, &amp;ldquo;because they can&amp;rsquo;t afford to hang on that thread for very much longer before then can actually sell some of their marvelous product,&amp;rdquo; said Bill Schweitzer of the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association (RVVA).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is a lot of inertia to make it harder, or continue to make it harder, to have boutique wineries in Ramona and San Diego County, and we, I think, have taken a respectful approach to the issue,&amp;rdquo; said Schweitzer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona vintners traveled throughout the state to see what makes the vineyard industry in other areas successful, he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;Rather than just complain to the board of supervisors, we synthesized a proposal and moved quite a long way on that ordinance with a lot of compromises and the discovery of the private road issue and the compromises that we put in there,&amp;rdquo; Schweitzer said, adding they are disheartened by the recent setback at the county that may delay an ordinance for years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RVVA met with an organization in San Diego&amp;rsquo;s Gaslamp district that may work on wholesale contracts with Ramona vintners, &amp;ldquo;but, without retail, you can&amp;rsquo;t really make a business selling wholesale,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Teri Kerns, an RVVA member and a Ramona Trails Association member, is working with both groups to establish trail connections to wineries, Schweitzer added.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jacob said she talked with county staff when she heard about the possible need for an EIR. If an EIR is needed, the county should pay for it, she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We will get there,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;We will have an ordinance that will allow retail sales and wine tasting, and we may end up with a tiered system and by right with the boutique wineries, just as the (RVV) association presented originally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;... In the end it may turn out better for the kind of goals that you&amp;rsquo;re talking about and to really honor the viticultural designation that Ramona has. ... This is not, as Bill and Carol said, just about the vintners. It&amp;rsquo;s about the town, and it would be a big part of Ramona.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;From turkeys to wine. Who would ever guess?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The turkeys died out,&amp;rdquo; Ramona chamber director Jo Fox said, referring to Ramona&amp;rsquo;s reputation in the 1930s and &amp;rsquo;40s as a turkey capital. &amp;ldquo;Now we need the wine.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Copyright Ramona Sentinel&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonasentinel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonasentinel.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;27 March 2008 &amp;ndash; Ramona Sentinel&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Supervisors&amp;#39; hearing on boutique winery proposal postponed for environmental report&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe Naiman 24.MAR.08&lt;br&gt;In a best-case scenario for those who wish to see the county&amp;#39;s proposed boutique winery ordinance take effect, the hearing at the San Diego County Board of Supervisors has been delayed from March 26 to April 23. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The worst-case scenario for proponents is that an environmental impact report (EIR) will be required to address the impacts of the ordinance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It was determined that there were some changes that needed to be made to that ordinance,&amp;quot; said Glenn Russell of the county&amp;#39;s Department of Planning and Land Use at the March 21 hearing of the San Diego County Planning Commission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On March 7, the planning commission voted 4-0 with three members absent to recommend passage of a compromise proposal to allow wineries producing no more than 12,000 gallons per year and on agriculturally zoned land to operate tasting rooms and have on-premise wine sales without a major use permit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposed ordinance allows tasting rooms and on-premise sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads while establishing conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roads. If fewer than 10 parcels between the closest public road and the winery must be accessed, the winery may operate by right if the winery enters into a road maintenance agreement, which includes addressing the liability of property owners, with all parcel owners between the public road and the winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a road maintenance agreement cannot be obtained, or if more than 10 parcels between the public road and the winery are accessed, an administrative permit will be required. If any homeowners&amp;rsquo; association rules or other deed covenants exist, they will continue to the extent the winery property is already bound.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance was to have been heard March 26 by the county supervisors, and the March 21 Planning Commission hearing initially was to have discussed minor revisions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Department of Planning and Land Use staff was preparing the board letter for docketing at the supervisors&amp;rsquo; meeting, DPLU workers thought that additional changes were warranted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;It was determined that there do need to be changes,&amp;quot; said Joe Farace of DPLU.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DPLU also determined that insufficient notice of the March 21 hearing was provided, so the planning commission voted 7-0 to continue the hearing to April 4. DPLU did not comment on what the proposed changes would entail. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We don&amp;#39;t feel that it is appropriate to discuss the substance of the issue today,&amp;quot; Russell said at the March 21 hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re still working on it, so I think it&amp;#39;s a bit premature to go into detail on it,&amp;quot; Farace said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We are totally taken aback,&amp;quot; said Carolyn Harris of Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris is the secretary and general counsel of the Ramona Valley Winery Association. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;All this has had a chance for review,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A March 20 memo indicated that after evaluating all of the information received and conferring with county counsel, DPLU determined that an EIR would be needed to address potential noise, traffic, and groundwater impacts from by-right on-premise sales and tasting rooms at boutique wineries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The planning commission had approved an environmental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the ordinance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;They, after two years, are going to do a 180 on this,&amp;quot; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris called an EIR more of a weapon than a process. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;They took a hand grenade and turned it into a nuclear bomb,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris noted that the Mitigated Negative Declaration had previously withstood scrutiny during planning commission decisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harvesting and wholesale sales (with state approval) are already permitted uses in agricultural areas, and the county has about 40 bonded wineries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This is a small incremental change to an existing winery ordinance,&amp;quot; said Bill Schweitzer, president of the Ramona Valley Vineyard Association.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schweitzer questioned why groundwater impacts would be required to be studied when grapes can be grown and harvested by right. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;What is this, the groundwater it takes to wash a couple of wine glasses a week?&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Planning Commissioner John Riess noted that a defect in the negative declaration, for example omission of an archeological site, would require an EIR. Certification of a negative declaration that addresses impacts is a discretionary matter. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;If they&amp;#39;re asking for a two-week continuance, there&amp;#39;s no EIR involved,&amp;quot; Riess said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;#39;m really dismayed also, disappointed in the process,&amp;quot; said Planning Commissioner Bryan Woods. &amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s a lot of folks out there who are depending on some sort of resolution on this.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Copyright Ramona Sentinel &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonasentinel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonasentinel.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;_________________________________________________________________&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;20 March 2008 - Ramona Sentinel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Supervisors to see new winery rules&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe Naiman&lt;br&gt;San Diego County Board of Supervisors will review a compromise version of a proposed boutique winery ordinance on Wednesday, March 26. County planning commissioners voted 4-0 this month in favor of recommending the proposed ordinance with Leon Brooks, David Kreitzer, David Pallinger, and John Riess in favor, and Michael Beck, Adam Day, and Bryan Woods not present. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leaders from both sides of previous debates supported the compromise, while some members from each side expressed opposition to the clauses intended to address each other&amp;rsquo;s concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;As long as everybody&amp;rsquo;s pretty much unhappy, we&amp;rsquo;re really getting close,&amp;rdquo; said Carolyn Harris of Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona, which has two acres of zinfindel and brumello.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;I believe this ordinance has compromised and taken into account all our neighbors&amp;rsquo; concerns,&amp;rdquo; said Beth Edwards of Edwards Cellars. &amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;ve done everything that we think is above and beyond to accommodate as many people as possible in these ag zone areas that have ultimately become residential.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris is also the secretary and general counsel of the Ramona Valley Winery Association. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The issues are narrowing; they&amp;rsquo;re not expanding,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;We understand the issue of accommodating and making sure that this is a fair ordinance.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During a Dec. 5 hearing of the county board of supervisors, the Ramona Valley Winery Association offered a compromise on the private road issue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;rsquo; 5-0 vote Dec. 5 directed county staff to return to the supervisors with an ordinance that would allow tasting rooms and on-premise wine sales by right for boutique wineries accessed by public roads while establishing conditions for boutique wineries accessed by private roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance drafted by county staff provided language similar to the Ramona Valley Winery Association proposal. If fewer than 10 parcels between the closest public road and the winery must be accessed, the winery may operate by right if the winery enters into a road maintenance agreement, which includes addressing the liability of property owners, with all parcel owners between the public road and the winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a road maintenance agreement cannot be obtained, or if more than 10 parcels between the public road and the winery are accessed, an administrative permit will be required.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;I believe that this change is the best possible compromise,&amp;rdquo; said Tom Ramsthaler, who lives on a private road in Ramona that has two wineries and 26 houses and who opposed previous versions of the ordinance. &amp;ldquo;It encourages neighbors to get together to talk and do the right thing.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administrative permit process requires notification of all property owners within 300 feet of the winery&amp;rsquo;s boundaries and notification of at least 20 property owners. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administrative permit will not require a hearing unless either the applicant or an affected party requests such a hearing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;If nobody disagrees, that permit sails right through,&amp;rdquo; Ramsthaler said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents have indicated that all owners of a private road may be liable if an accident occurs and that trips to wineries may create a disproportional burden on private roads for which all owners share maintenance cost responsibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re looking for the winery to step up to the road maintenance agreement,&amp;rdquo; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The situation of a lawsuit against all private road owners is theoretical and neither proponents nor opponents are aware of any cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We respect those issues, and I think we will see them reflected in the ultimate ordinance,&amp;rdquo; Harris said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have tried to reach out to those who oppose this ordinance and come to a model agreement,&amp;rdquo; said Ramona Valley Winery Association member Michael Kopp of Kohill Winery, who grows various varietals on 2.3 acres in Ramona. &amp;ldquo;We are very concerned about preserving the character of our region.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris noted that winery owners would still be subject to unilateral blocking of a winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re just down to this one issue,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;ve come a long way.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 10-parcel threshold includes parcels on all roadway access between the public road and the winery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;If that covers multiple roads, we would count those,&amp;rdquo; said Lory Nagem of the county&amp;rsquo;s Department of Planning and Land Use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The supervisors&amp;rsquo; February 2007 recommendation created four new categories of wineries in addition to the Wholesale Limited Winery category. Boutique wineries produce no more than 12,000 gallons per year, small wineries produce up to 55,999 gallons annually, medium wineries produce under 100,000 gallons, and large wineries produce at least 100,000 gallons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance under consideration only covers boutique wineries. The only winery in San Diego County currently producing more than 12,000 gallons annually is Orfila Vineyards in the San Pasqual Valley.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sales, tasting, and special events were proposed to be allowed by right at boutique wineries, with an administrative permit for small wineries, with a minor use permit for medium wineries, and with a major use permit for large wineries. One tasting room of up to 30 percent of the production facility&amp;rsquo;s area or 2,000 square feet (whichever is greater) would be allowed for all wineries, and up to 30 percent of the tasting room area would be allowed for non-wine retail sales.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boutique wineries would not be allowed to host special events and could hold up to four marketing events per year. The marketing events would be limited to between 10 a.m. and sunset. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Retail sales would be allowed seven days a week between 10 a.m. and sunset. At least 75 percent of the wines sold must be from San Diego County grapes, and 25 percent of the wine must be from grapes grown on-site, although the county&amp;rsquo;s Department of Agriculture, Weights and Measures could suspend the requirement during adverse environmental circumstances or extreme economic conditions (one potential solution to the private road issue is allowing co-op tasting rooms in which wineries off private roads would send wine to facilities accessible by public roads. That is permissible under wineries&amp;rsquo; state licenses but may require a waiver of the 25 percent threshold). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pre-packaged food could be sold and consumed, and food service would be allowed if catered or from a facility approved by the county&amp;rsquo;s Department of Environmental Health. No bus or caravan tours would be allowed for boutique wineries, and outdoor eating areas would be limited to five tables and no more than ten people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harvesting and wholesale sales (with state approval) are already permitted uses in agricultural areas. The county currently has more than 40 bonded wineries. Schwaesdall Winery in Ramona is the county&amp;rsquo;s only boutique winery that has a major use permit for a tasting room, although John Schwaesdall completed that process in 1996 at a cost of $7,000. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The average major use permit now costs $218,000 with some applicants paying below the average and others paying above the average.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Sept. 7, the county&amp;rsquo;s planning commission unanimously returned the matter to the Board of Supervisors without a specific ordinance but recommended that wineries accessible by public roads should be allowed by right while noting that time would be required for a solution to wineries accessed by private roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A separate board of supervisors vote Dec. 5 directed county staff to explore the feasibility of establishing viticultural zones in San Diego County. The proposed boutique winery ordinance only applies to properties with A70 and A72 agricultural zoning and was specifically designed to avoid boutique wineries in areas with residential zoning, but grapes are also grown on properties with S92, or general rural, zoning. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;S92 zoning allows for residential and agricultural use and is intended to provide controls for land with rugged terrain, watersheds, dependence on groundwater, susceptibility to fire and erosion, or subject to other environmental constraints. Grapes have been touted as a low-water crop suitable for water-restricted situations. The planning commission&amp;rsquo;s March 7 hearing did not address the establishment of viticultural zones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although most of the speakers on both sides live in Ramona, the proposed ordinance drew opposition from the Twin Oaks Valley Sponsor Group. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;No logic is provided to explain why less populated roads deserve a lower level of protection,&amp;rdquo; said sponsor group representative Henry Palmer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Palmer also noted that lot splits could lead to higher densities in areas with tasting rooms. Although the ordinance prohibits off-premises parking, Palmer noted that the parking space requirement calculation was based on average rather than worst-case use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;People will park wherever they can when parking space is full,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Palmer noted that most of the wine tasting will occur on weekends, outside the normal Code Enforcement hours. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;I don&amp;rsquo;t think you can rely on Code Enforcement to enforce parking regulations,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The advantage of on-site tasting rooms is that they introduce customers to wineries for future direct mail or Internet sales, and Harris noted that the goal of tasting rooms is not to sell one bottle at a time on-site. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re talking about the initial introduction,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;What we&amp;rsquo;re looking for is a way to simply introduce the wine at the source.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris indicated that approximately 24 cases could be produced from a quarter-acre of grapes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The entire regulation&amp;rsquo;s naturally self-limiting,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re trying to accommodate farmers who are conducting an agricultural enterprise in an agricultural zone,&amp;rdquo; said San Diego County Farm Bureau executive director Eric Larson. &amp;ldquo;This is a right we give to all other farming in San Diego County.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson noted that A70 and A72 zoning allow for commercial operations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;Farms are business,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larson was willing to accept the compromise but indicated that the Farm Bureau would seek a review if the administrative permit process was found to be too onerous for growers. He also fears that the liability agreement issue would eventually require all farmers to have such liability agreements. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We think that&amp;rsquo;s a mistake to set that precedent,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Members of the farm bureau are on both sides of the private road issue, so the farm bureau has taken no position on private road restrictions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 10-parcel threshold was not acceptable to Eric Metz, who owns 125 acres in Ramona. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;It has to be legally defensible in not being based on an arbitrary figure,&amp;rdquo; he said of the threshold. &amp;ldquo;This violates equal rights protection requirements and is not defensible.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dennis Grimes of Ramona also opposed the 10-parcel threshold.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The county has not completed any road studies to substantiate the 10-parcel limit,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;I would like to see a wine ordinance drafted that supports the wine industry.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Richard McClellan has a Ramona vineyard but not a winery on his San Diego County property. He is a partner with a nephew with a winery in eastern Washington.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;Making good wine doesn&amp;rsquo;t cut it,&amp;rdquo; McClellan said. &amp;ldquo;You have to have a personal connection or it doesn&amp;rsquo;t succeed.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Schweitzer&amp;rsquo;s six-acre Paccielo Vineyard in Ramona sells sangiovese and cabernet sauvignon grapes to local wineries but does not produce wine itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We are standing alone right now&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as the only county in California that has the opportunity to grow grapes, grow quality premium wine grapes, and does not support it,&amp;rdquo; Schweitzer said. &amp;ldquo;The rest of California supports the largest agricultural business in the state.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rosaria Salerno and her husband own Salerno Winery in Ramona, which is accessed from a public road. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;We are ready to go,&amp;rdquo; Salerno said. &amp;ldquo;Let us do our business.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ramona resident Don Kovacic is one of the past opponents who is not satisfied with the compromise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;This is not agriculture. This is manufacturing and retail sales,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;The proposed ordinance here does not solve the problem of private road liability. There are major problems with this.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kovacic suggested alternatives such as streamlining the permit process or waiving fees rather than eliminating the major use permit requirement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;The existing structure is the best way to do this,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim Beggs of Ramona noted that nearly one-quarter of the unincorporated county&amp;rsquo;s land has A70 or A72 zoning. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;ldquo;There&amp;rsquo;s a widespread impact,&amp;rdquo; Beggs said. &amp;ldquo;Not all A70 and A72 neighborhoods are the same as they were in 1979.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Copyright Ramona Sentinel &lt;a class=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.comhttp://www.ramonasentinel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.ramonasentinel.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;_________________________________________________________________&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;8 March 2008 - North County Times&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Local vintners on private roads may get tasting rooms&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;By: DARRYN BENNETT - Staff Writer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NORTH COUNTY ---- After months of negotiations involving planners, vintners and their disgruntled neighbors, the San Diego County Planning Commission unanimously approved a proposal Friday that allows wineries on private roads to open tasting rooms without having to pay for expensive permits and studies that can cost as much as $200,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;County officials said they consider the ordinance a compromise between grape growers and backcountry residents. &lt;br&gt;For more than a year, vineyard owners have asked for an ordinance to let wine enthusiasts travel private roads to sample ---- and hopefully purchase ---- local wines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To address concerns that wine tasters would wear out rural roads, the ordinance calls for wineries on private roads with fewer than 10 residences to enter into a formal road maintenance agreement with neighbors. Applicants on private roads with more than 10 residences would have to get a permit from the county.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal is set to be voted on by the county Board of Supervisors on March 26, county spokeswoman Tammy Glenn said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vineyard owners first asked county supervisors to consider their proposal for &amp;quot;boutique&amp;quot; wineries ---- those producing fewer than 12,000 gallons of wine per year ---- in October 2006.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last year, supervisors directed county planners create an ordinance that would allow the small wineries to open tasting rooms and sell their wines to the public without obtaining pricey major-use permits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Proponents, including some county officials and the Ramona Valley Winery Association, a loose coalition of 13 wineries, say easing restrictions could help revive the county&amp;#39;s once-booming, pre-Prohibition wine industry, boost the county&amp;#39;s tax base and draw tourists to the region. Vintners and growers also have said in testimony to the board that tasting rooms would make it possible for small wineries to become economically feasible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opponents, including some Ramona area residents, say most of the proposed wineries are on private roads, and that opening them to the public could invade residents&amp;#39; privacy and spark conflicts over liability issues. Others have opposed the ordinance on the grounds that tasting rooms would mar the rural community&amp;#39;s character and put drunken drivers on poorly maintained roads in the backcountry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nonsense, said Carolyn Harris, co-owner of Chuparosa Vineyards in Ramona.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She contends drunken driving wouldn&amp;#39;t be a problem, even though some winery owners in the region have expressed concerns about inebriated tasters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Wine tasters don&amp;#39;t have a reputation for being drunken drivers,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Harris said the private road restrictions the association suggested, which didn&amp;#39;t include maintenance agreements, were modeled after several other California counties that encourage winemaking, such as Santa Barbara and San Joaquin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other resident groups say wineries ---- no matter how small ----- have no place in rural communities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;What this is allowing by right, no permits of any kind, is to put up a small factory ... and that&amp;#39;s wrong,&amp;quot; Jack Phillips, chairman of the Valle de Oro Community Planning Group in East County, said Tuesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The group voted in January to oppose the ordinance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carolyn Dorroh, a member of the Ramona Community Planning Group, has suggested a &amp;quot;co-op&amp;quot; tasting room for private road wineries that would be located in a commercially zoned area and accessible from a publicly maintained road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, Harris said she was generally pleased with the proposal, but a few adjustments are still needed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ordinance approved Friday requires residents to unanimously agree to enter into a road maintenance agreement. Harris said it would be &amp;quot;impossible&amp;quot; to get unanimous consent from neighbors, because some residents will decline to participate in those kinds of contracts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;ve been at a nonstart and now we&amp;#39;re moving forward,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;We&amp;#39;ve listened to the opponents, I mean, we live with these people, and we&amp;#39;ve respected their objections. Now we&amp;#39;re moving forward.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Contact staff writer Darryn Bennett at (760) 740-5420 or &lt;a href=&quot;http://rvva.wetpaint.commailto:dmbennett@nctimes.com&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;dmbennett@nctimes.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;The road to tasting rooms&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;middot; October 2006: At the request of a coalition of vineyard owners, county supervisors order planners to work with the Ramona Valley Winery Association to find a way to allow &amp;quot;boutique&amp;quot; wineries to open tasting rooms without obtaining expensive permits.&lt;br&gt;&amp;middot; February 2007: Planners return with options for a wineries and tasting room ordinance, but opponents express concerns that wineries on private roads would generate too much traffic and encourage drunken driving in backcountry neighborhoods.&lt;br&gt;&amp;middot; September 2007: County planners work to find a compromise to allow tasting rooms while addressing private road concerns.&lt;br&gt;&amp;middot; December 2007: Supervisors order staff to create an ordinance requiring road maintenance agreements or permits based on the number of homes on a private road where a tasting room is located.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;March 2008: An ordinance allowing tasting rooms on private roads, with the condition vintners obtain a county permit or neighborhood maintenance agreement, is unanimously approved by the planning commission.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal is slated to go before supervisors for approval later this month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;external&quot